A Boeing 747 will then burn about 5 gallons of fuel per mile or 12 liters per kilometer. This sounds like a tremendously poor miles-per-gallon rating. Efficiency gains were larger early in the jet age than later, with a 55-67% gain from 1960 to 1980 and a 20-26% gain from 1980 to 2000. but herehttp://www.flywestwind.com/hangar/aircraft_files/foms/B752FOM.pdf Compare unlimited number of aircraft side-by-side. And max G loading for which I am looking. Meanwhile, generally considered to be one of the most fuel-efficient widebodies on the market, the Airbus A350 and its Rolls-Royce Trent XWB engines consume around 32 lb per nautical mile. Can you include what type of engine it is please. For flights of 500700nmi (9301,300km), For flights around 2,0003,000nmi (3,7005,600km), transcontinental (e.g. Photo: Getty Images. ", "ACC was key in my initial work to build my business model and validation process. Most aircraft have vast reserves for storing fuel, with the A350 capable of carrying over 37,000 gallons. Photo: Vincenzo Pace | Simple Flying. Did I witness an engine test for a 757 at MAN? Two NASA experiments designed to help reduce fuel consumption and emissions will fly this spring on a specially outfitted Boeing 757 airplane called the ecoDemonstrator. If you preorder a special airline meal (e.g. raising ticket costs to cope with the additional expenses. It only takes a minute to sign up. Surprisingly, on a per-passenger-basis, airplanes are actually quite fuel-efficient. [36], Yield management allows the optimization of the load factor, benefiting the fuel efficiency, as is the air traffic management optimization. one for one type of Pratt=Whitney engines and the other for another type of Pratt whiteny engine? Boeing 757-300: 1998: 243: 500 nmi (930 km) 5.19 kg/km (18.41 . Real world observations on 757-200 cargo. By increasing efficiency, a lower cruise-speed augments the range and reduces the environmental impact of aviation; however, a higher cruise-speed allows more revenue passenger miles flown per day. When it comes to fueling aircraft, there are strict guidelines in place because of the vast amounts involved. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site. DC-6-63 according to the flight operating manual will burn 45,300 kg while flying the route for an hour faster at the same load. This breaks down to $15,253.61 per hour. Every. Although low-cost carriers' higher seat-density increases fuel economy and lowers greenhouse gas emissions per-passenger-kilometer, the lower airfares cause a rebound effect of more flights and larger overall emissions. For example, even the super-fast turboprop Tu-114 on the route equivalent to LHR - JFK would have burned 45,400 kg at cruise M0.725 according to the norms of the Ministry of Aviation of the USSR. A reduction in airframe weight enables the use of smaller, lighter engines. They made 5 with turbojets which greatly increased the range but still far less than Concorde. Burning a total of 2326187 pounds of fuel. Average fuel burn of new aircraft fell 45% from 1968 to 2014, a compounded annual reduction 1.3% with variable reduction rate. To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers. Is there a solution to add special characters from software and how to do it. The A350 burns approximately 14,000 gallons of fuel on a transatlantic hop. Does Counterspell prevent from any further spells being cast on a given turn? How to tell which packages are held back due to phased updates, ERROR: CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW WITH DATA cannot be executed from a function. Commercial operations could begin in 2025 with airline schedule adjustments, and other manufacturers aircraft could be included. To obtain a longer range, a larger fuel fraction of the maximum takeoff weight is needed, adversely affecting efficiency. Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries, Airport Overviews The C-17 measures 174 feet long (53 meters) with a wingspan of 169 feet, 10 inches (51.75 meters). Why is this sentence from The Great Gatsby grammatical? Did any DOS compatibility layers exist for any UNIX-like systems before DOS started to become outmoded? One includes 31 small devices that will blow jets of air on the vertical tail and the other involves non-stick coatings to help repel bugs from the leading edge of wings. Do I need a thermal expansion tank if I already have a pressure tank? [4], As the weight indirectly generates lift-induced drag, its minimization leads to better aircraft efficiency. 5000 pounds x 0.5 pound mass/hour/pound x 2 hours = 5000 pound mass of fuel. What video game is Charlie playing in Poker Face S01E07? [16][17][verification needed], Jet fuel cost and emissions reduction have renewed interest in the propfan concept for jetliners with an emphasis on engine/airframe efficiency that might come into service beyond the Boeing 787 and Airbus A350XWB. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Following regulatory certification in January 1999 . Why do small African island nations perform better than African continental nations, considering democracy and human development? [38] This equates to around $46,000 for the flight. In fact, the 747-8 burns roughly like 747-400 about 10,300 kg / h but takes more passengers. While the exact fuel consumption of your car changes based on your circumstances (city or highway, road conditions, tire. Thanks in advance! [51] [3], Wingtip devices increase the effective wing-aspect ratio, lowering lift-induced drag caused by wingtip vortices and improving the lift-to-drag ratio without increasing the wingspan. do you have the width of the flight deck at the pilot seats? Our large helicopter section. At constant propulsive efficiency, the maximum range speed is when the ratio between velocity and drag is minimal,[23] while maximum endurance is attained at the best lift-to-drag ratio. Airport overviews from the air or ground, Tails and Winglets Upload your company logo and contact information. The tough ones to capture are the APU capital costs and maintenance costs. I don't think I buy that a DC-8-63 burns less than a 707-320B. This 3,300 km route coincides with the real commercial route Tu-144C Moscow-Almaty, the flight time was 2 hours, trip fuel 76.5 tons, headwind 80 km / hour. The average level of consumption for a new car is approximately 35 miles to the gallon, which means that in order to burn 18,000 gallons of fuel, a car would have to travel more than half a million miles. Second hour: 7680 kgs; Third hour: 11,160 kgs; Fourth hour: 14,880 kgs; Fifth hour: 18,750 kgs; Sixth hour: 22,860 kgs; Seventh hour: 26,880 kgs; Eighth hour: 30,960 kgs. min. Its 92,000-pound (41,731 kilogram) fuel capacity allows the aircraft to travel 5,500 nautical miles unrefueled. [39], Modern jet aircraft have twice the fuel efficiency of the earliest jet airliners. Aircraft Fuel Consumption With 268.6 total hours of flight time. Would like to know the condition being made when yielding such table, After analyzing the DOT statistics and some other sources, including operating manuals, it is necessary to make some corrections to the fuel burn data list. In the late 2000s/early 2010s, rising fuel prices coupled with the Great Recession caused the cancellation of many ultra-long haul, non-stop flights. Over the transatlantic route, the most-active intercontinental market, the average fuel consumption in 2017 was 34 pax-km per L (2.94L/100km[80mpgUS] per passenger). Understand how financing, capital cost considerations, residual values, and lease payments affect your operating costs. Washington Dulles Seattle-Tacoma is 2,000 nmi) to short transatlantic flights (e.g. Aircraft efficiency is augmented by maximizing lift-to-drag ratio, which is attained by minimizing parasitic drag and lift-generated induced drag, the two components of aerodynamic drag. ", "U.S. domestic airline fuel-efficiency ranking 2017-2018", "Calculating the carbon footprint from different classes of air travel", "SAS flies slower to save costs and emissions", "Transpacific airline fuel efficiency ranking, 2016", "Aeroflot, the route to a modern airline. How many hydraulic systems does the Boeing 757 series have? [citation needed], Since early 2006 until 2008, Scandinavian airlines (SAS) was flying slower, from 860 to 780 km/h, to save on fuel costs and curb emissions of carbon dioxide. The Airbus A321 featuring Sharklet wingtip devices consume 2.2L/100km (110mpgUS) per person with a 200-seat layout for WOW Air. [52], Airbus airliners delivered in 2019 had a carbon intensity of 66.6 g of CO2e per passenger-kilometre, improving to 63.5g in 2020.[53]. In 2021, the highest seating density in its A330neo, with 459 single-class seats, enabled Cebu Pacific to claim the lowest carbon footprint with 1.4kg (3lb) of fuel per seat per 100km,[32] equivalent to 1.75L/100km[134mpgUS] per seat. What is that Boeing 757 custom cockpit interface? Trump pays a lavish price for these amenities and shells out about $10,800 for a one-hour flight including fuel. Additionally loose loaded freight can be carried in the below compartments. Continuous Descent Approaches can reduce emissions. depending on aircraft version, flight route and the nature of cargo. As a result, how much fuel per passenger an aircraft is consuming is one of the most important . In 2018, the US airlines had a fuel consumption of 58mpgUS (4.06L/100km) per revenue passenger for domestic flights,[21] The Boeing 757-200 freighters can carry 15 pallets on the cargo main deck. What is the fuel consumption of a Boeing 767 . I think i know how to work out how much fuel is used for an overall distance, but not sure how i would work out how much fuel is used during a cruising hour? The Boeing 787 Dreamliner was the first airliner with a mostly composite airframe. A more realistic passenger load is 90 per cent, in which case fuel consumption per passenger is 2.2 litres/100km. Depreciation schedules fully editable by the user. Fuel prices have increased by far over 100% over the past year. Curious on the circumference of the fuselage itself past the cockpit area if anyone has that info? As we see, an Airbus A380 burns twice as much fuel per hour as a Boeing 787-9. Activities: Guided Tours EngineSim - Engine Simulator: These figures correspond to overall . I hope this information will be interesting. thanks, Sir The aircraft's maximum range is determined by the level of efficiency with which thrust can be applied to overcome the aerodynamic drag. Is there somewhere where you can find out the fuel burn for take off? https://www.transportenvironment.org/si ciency.pdf, https://www.fs.fed.us/fire/contracting/ 1-2013.pdf, https://www.fs.fed.us/fire/contracting/ rs_cwn.htm, https://www.icao.int/environmental-prot 9_2016.pdf, http://www.saabaircraftleasing.com/prod 00_jar.pdf, http://www.sasgroup.net/en/airbus-a319- -a320a321/. SWISS Reveals New Airbus A330 Cabin Designs, United Airlines To Increase Guam-Japan Flights This Summer, Uganda Airlines Reinstates Fifth Johannesburg Flight, Singapore Airlines' Low-Cost Subsidiary: The Scoot Fleet In 2023, Rome Is American Airlines 2nd Most Served European Airport This Summer, Vistara Brand To Discontinue After Merger With Air India. Mutually exclusive execution using std::atomic? [2] A 88 gCO/km represents 28 g of fuel per km, or a 3.5L/100km (67mpgUS) fuel consumption. This would make airlines far more attracted to buying the A220 over the Boeing 737 as the price of fuel goes up. I'm looking for the average fuel burn rates for a Boeing 757-200 at MTOW during the first hour of flight, and then the same, the average fuel burn rate for the second hour of flight. But consider that a 747 can carry as many as 568 people. ", "Comparing two aircraft over a specific mission and the results were +/-3 % of what I came up with on my own. It may consume 36,000 gallons of fuel during the course of a 10-hour journey (150,000 liters). Hi, the interior width of the Boeing 757 website is 11ft 7in (3,53 meter). But the comparison is not as simple as it might seem initially. Performance for the Purpose of a Commercial Aircraft", "CS300 first flight Wednesday, direct challenge to 737-7 and A319neo", "Environmental impact assessment of aviation emission reduction through the implementation of composite materials", "Modern, Quiet and Environmentally Efficient: Lufthansa Group Orders 59 Ultra-Modern Wide-Body Boeing 777-9X and Airbus A350-900 Aircraft", "WOW air Sources A321s for Transatlantic Launch", "Airbus reports emissions data amid climate pressure", "Beechcraft 1900D: Fuel, Emissions & Cost Savings Operational Analysis", "Proud to fly a Turboprop: Q400 vs ATR72", "Owner's & Operator's Guide: ERJ-135/-140/-145", "Embraer continues and refines its strategy at the low-end of 100-149 seat sector", "ANALYSIS: A320neo vs. 737 MAX: Airbus is Leading (Slightly) Part II", "A Prius With Wings vs. a Guzzler in the Clouds", "CS100 environmental product declaration", "CS300 environmental product declaration", "Owner's & Operator's Guide: E-Jets family", "Sukhoi SSJ100, Embraer ERJ190, Airbus A319 Operational and Economic Comparison", "Analysing the options for 757 replacement", "Boeing 737 MAX: performance with reported engine SFC shortfall", "Carbon Offset Calculators for Air Travel", "Redefining the 757 replacement: Requirement for the 225/5000 Sector", "UPDATED ANALYSIS: Delta Order for A350; A330neo Hinged on Pricing, Availability", "737 MAX 8 could be enabler for some LCC Long Haul", "Aeroflot outlines performance expectations for MC-21s", "A350-900/-1000 fuel burn & operating performance", "ANALYSIS: The Boeing 787-8 and Airbus A330-800neo are Far From Dead", "Airbus A350: is the Xtra making the difference? To minimize fuel consumption, an aircraft should cruise close to the maximum altitude at which it can generate sufficient lift to maintain its altitude. What is the point of Thrower's Bandolier? I think GriN's post is regarding the earlier engines. Its maximum take-off weight is nearly one million pounds. There are strict stipulations in place for each of these; for example, contingency fuel is required to be at least 5% on top of the total fuel needed for the trip. Below the link to the Boeing manual: What sort of strategies would a medieval military use against a fantasy giant? New technology can reduce engine fuel consumption, like higher pressure and bypass ratios, geared turbofans, open rotors, hybrid electric or fully electric propulsion; and airframe efficiency with retrofits, better materials and systems and advanced aerodynamics. please tell me about dimension of spoiler length and breadth ? It is more fuel-efficient to make a non-stop flight at less than this distance and to make a stop when covering a greater total distance.[7]. For a given payload, a lighter airframe generates a lower drag. The 757 is a narrow-body airliner with the normal configuration being 3 seats on either side of a single aisle. Power consumption of the Boeing 747. Piston only, Helicopter only, Turboprop & Jet subscription options available. Without your data, I don't think I ever would have been able to convince myself and those supporting me to do this.". [34][35], Airbus presented the following measures to save fuel, in its example of an A330 flying 2,500 nautical miles (4,600km) on a route like BangkokTokyo: direct routing saves 190kg (420lb) fuel by flying 40km (25mi) less; 600kg (1,300lb) more fuel is consumed if flying 600m (2,000ft) below optimum altitude without vertical flight profile optimization; cruising 0.01 mach above optimum consumes 800kg (1,800lb) more fuel; 1,000kg (2,200lb) more fuel on board consumes 150kg (330lb) more fuel while 100 litres (22impgal; 26USgal) of unused potable water consumes 15kg (33lb) more fuel. You'll be able to produce the precise detailed reports you need in minutes, not hours, to make important, informed decisions about the true cost of aircraft operations. Geometrical patterns or variable cloudings in the most vivid color.boeing 777 fuel consumption per hour"I can't consent to that," she said with painfully compressed lips. Sorted by: 11 The following table shows the long range cruise control data for a Boeing 737-800 (source: FCOMv1 Performance Inflight - All Engine PI.31.2): Let us consider a typical cruise at FL370 with a weight of $ 65 \, \mathrm {t} $. Scrapped and to be scrapped aircraft, or museum aircraft, http://www.flywestwind.com/hangar/aircraft_files/foms/B752FOM.pdf, http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/commercial/airports/acaps/757_23.pdf, Fuerza Aerea Argentina to receive new 757 government aircraft, developed by Pemco Aeroplex as conversion to existing 757 aircraft, combi; mixed cargo/passenger version; only one delivered to Royal Nepal Airlines, modified 200 converted to Special Freighter, extended range version; more than 1000 km increase in range, military version; 4 built for US Air Force, PW2037/RB211-535E4: 42680 liters (11276 US gallons), from 178 in 2-class to 239 passengers in all tourist, 1 front portside, 2 rear mid ships (239 passenger version), 13.59 meter (min) (44 ft 6 in) / 13.74 meter (max) (45 ft 1 in), 19.8 m (699.23 cu ft) (forward) / 27.5 m (971.15 cu ft) (rear), PW: 58440 - 59160 kg (128840 - 130440 lb), max take-off weight (PW2037 & RB211-535E4), max take-off weight (PW2040 & RB211-535E4--B), max landing weight (PW2037 & RB211-535E4), max landing weight (PW2040 & RB211-535E4-B), 11675 meter (38300 ft) / 10760 meter (35300 ft), cruising height (RB211-535E4 / RB211-535E4-B), 11800 meter (38700 ft) / 10850 meter (35600 ft), 1825 meter (6000 ft) / 2360 meter (7750 ft), take-off field length (RB211-535E4 / RB211-535E4-B), 1660 meter (5450 ft) / 2070 mtr (6800 ft), 1475 meter (4850 ft) / 1550 meter (5100 ft), landing field length )(RB211-535E4 / RB211-535E4-B), 1420 meter (4660 ft) / 1505 meter (4950 ft). The Boeing 757-300 is short-to-medium-range jetliner, launched in Sept. 2, 1996, with an order from Condor Flugdienst. Large carriers, for example, have maintenance budgets in excess of $1 billion. Fuel capacity: PW2037/RB211-535E4: 42680 liters (11276 US gallons) PW2040/RB211-535E4-B: 43490 liters (11489 US gallons) Accommodation; flight deck: 2: Specification sheets for all of the machines in our database, including the latest pre-owned pricing. Efficiency is increased with better aerodynamics and by reducing weight, and with improved engine BSFC and propulsive efficiency or TSFC. ", "Aurora Flight Sciences to evaluate NASA electric airliner design", "Review of Propulsion Technologies for N+3 Subsonic Vehicle Concepts", "Fuel burn rates of commercial passenger aircraft: Variations by seat configuration and stage distance Article", "Transatlantic airline fuel efficiency ranking, 2014", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fuel_economy_in_aircraft&oldid=1141741306, 9.19km/kg or 13.6 L/100km in a four-seat diesel-powered, 20-25% from high pressure core + ultra-high by-pass ratio, 4 to 10% from materials and Structure (composite structure, adjustable landing gear, fly-by-wire) also currently available, 5 to 15% from advanced aerodynamics (hybrid/, 35% from a double bubble fuselage like the, Up to 100% with fully electric aircraft (short range, ~2035-45), This page was last edited on 26 February 2023, at 15:25. A small piston-powered helicopter normally uses between 6-16 gallons of fuel per hour. If you have a range for each period, that be cool as well. For private aircraft in general aviation, current FAI Aeroplane Efficiency records are:[102]. That translates to 0.01 gallons per person per mile for the plane. Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior, Cargo Aircraft As far as I know, in ISA conditions in long range cruise classics B733-5 would burn 1/23 of its weight per hour, while NG would burn 1/27 1/28 of its weight in hourly fuel flow. [105][106] NASA has created a cruise efficient STOL (CESTOL) concept. Published Jun 12, 2010. Induced drag can be reduced by decreasing the size of the airframe, fuel and payload weight, and by increasing the wing aspect ratio or by using wingtip devices at the cost of increased structure weight. If you are looking for a specific thing you are looking for, please let me know. Fuel costs for carriers can be pretty staggering - especially when taking into consideration that global jet fuel prices have gone up 123.2% compared to a year ago. Lookhere says approach speed (PW2037 & RB211-535E4) 132 knots (245 km/h) rev2023.3.3.43278. The Soviet aircraft resource was also inferior to Western aircraft, for example, the maximum known number of cycles for the Soviet jet the Tu-134 is 31,000 cycles, while the DC-9 reached 105,000 cycles. How can I calculate the fuel consumption of an Airbus 320-200 at various loads? per hour: $19,432 - per nautical mile: $46.97 - per nautical seat mile: $2.47 Source: Conklin & de Decker, Orleans, Mass. Rising fuel prices are also in the news as a result of the war in Ukraine. However, as a guideline APU costs when compared to fixed GPU systems are from 6 (A320) to 25 (A340-500) times more expensive. Your email address will not be published. Every. In 2015 Ryanair emitted 8.64Bnt of CO2 for 545,034 sectors flown: 15.85t per 776mi (674nmi; 1,249km) average sector (or 5.04t of fuel: 4.04kg/km) representing 95kg per 90.6million passengers (30.4kg of fuel: 3.04L/100km or 76gCO2/km). Capabilities and Features - Current Presidential Airplane (Boeing 747-200) Today, the chief executive flies aboard a specially configured 747-200B, the newest and largest presidential airplane. [38] Every second, a Boeing 747 consumes around 1 gallon of fuel (about 4 liters). Both military and civil versions, Blimps / Airships The Boeing 757 is a low-wing twin-jet airliner that was produced by Boeing Commercial Airplanes from 1981 to 2004. "It's with my pleasure to refer Jack Prewitt to your service, which we have found to be accurate, straightforward and of real benefit to our clients. No wonder airlines have had to resort to raising ticket costs to cope with the additional expenses. For a comparison with ground transportation - much slower and with shorter range than air travel - a Volvo bus 9700 averages 0.41L/100km (570mpgUS) per seat for 63 seats. Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience. Fuel consumption numbers depend upon a lot of factors including flight takeoff weight, flight time, cruising altitude and the like. Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. Compare that to the average motor vehicle. [13][need quotation to verify], Turboprops have an optimum speed below 460 miles per hour (740km/h). If an Airbus A321neo consumes 0.683 liters per second, a Boeing 747 consumes approximately 4 liters per second, or 240 liters per minute and 14,400 liters per hour. then go to the worldwide standard: KM, meters, liters, centigrade. Why didn't the Boeing 757 share the 767 fuselage? That means that during a five-hour flight, a Boeing 747 will burn 18,000 gallons of fuel. Based on 450 annual owner-operated hours and $7.00-per-gallon fuel cost, the BOEING 757-200ER has total variable costs of $4,549,702.50, total fixed costs of $414,150.00, and an annual budget of $4,963,852.50. While several more fuel-efficient aircraft are traversing the skies today, a Boeing 747 quadjet burns up to one gallon of fuel every second. It . For example, the Airbus A350 design includes a majority of light-weight composite materials. When you start to examine the numbers, they start to get pretty big, pretty quick. U.S. Navy Orders Up To 64 Beechcraft King Air 260 Turboprops For New Multi-Engine Training System, Gulfstream Completes 100th Delivery Of Award-Winning G600 Business Jet, Embraer Phenom 300 Series Tops Light Jet Class In Deliveries For 11th Consecutive Year, Following Seasonal Inventory Declines, Aircraft Asking Values Continue Year-Over-Year Growth. [citation needed]. Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos. Is there a single-word adjective for "having exceptionally strong moral principles"? Is the A300 figure from a first-gen B2 or a later-gen -600? This included the services provided by Singapore Airlines from Singapore to both Newark and Los Angeles that was ended in late 2013. You can study the effects of any engine component's performance on fuel consumption and compare the efficiency of various types of turbine engines. Would you know the service ceiling and the max certified altitude? After A380s tests showing 12% savings, test flights were scheduled for 2020 with two A350s, before transatlantic flight trials with airlines in 2021. Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon, Accidents This equates to roughly 1 gallon (approximately 4 litres) of fuel every second. Next, we go into the details. The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user. The four engines of the Boeing 747 Jumbo Jet burn approximately 10 to 11 tonnes of fuel an hour when in the cruise. The International Air Transport Association (IATA) technology roadmap envisions improvements in aircraft configuration and aerodynamics. [109] [24], From 2010 to 2012, the most fuel-efficient US domestic airline was Alaska Airlines, due partly to its regional affiliate Horizon Air flying turboprops. Most of the (extremely) generic references I've seen using that metric for a Boeing 747-400 are in the US$25,000 per hour range. Brooks says a DC-3 with 1200-hp R1830s cruising at 550 hp per engine at 6000 ft will burn 490 pounds/hour. Still, I appreciate the suggestion. [41] The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Turboprops have an optimum speed below 460 miles per hour (740 km/h). [20] Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. Width of runways still 100? Our Boeing 727-200 consumes a calculated average of 8660.4 pounds of fuel per hour. A rule-of-thumb is that a reduction in fuel consumption of about 0.75% results from each 1% reduction in weight. The 747 burns approximately 5 gallons of fuel per mile (12 liters of fuel per kilometer). ), and why my beloved 747 is clearly on the way out the door. Dont hesitate to use my name or to have any interested broker call me. This means that the aircraft is achieving 100 miles to the gallon for every passenger. Let's take a look at how much Jet A a widebody aircraft actually uses as it traverses the skies. At a macro level, aircraft operating costs include both flight . To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. looking to purchase some stairs to fit the 757, no stats on ground to door sill ? Comfort would not be affected and trials are limited to two aircraft to reduce complexity but the concept could be expanded to include more. It projects the following reductions in engine fuel consumption, compared to baseline aircraft in service in 2015:[108], Moreover, it projects the following gains for aircraft design technologies:[108], Today's tube-and-wing configuration could remain in use until the 2030s due to drag reductions from active flutter suppression for slender flexible-wings and natural and hybrid laminar flow. Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. Fully editable pre-loaded "real world" data for over 500+ aircraft - piston, turboprop, jet, & helicopter available in ONE application. . This works out to about 852 - 941 gallons per hour (at 6.8 Lbs per gallon) For rough calculations, I consider 100 pounds per minute of flight. That may be true, but the problem with the TU-144 engines (certainly the early ones) was they were turbofans, not turbojets like Concordes. By clicking Post Your Answer, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy. Parasitic drag is constituted by form drag and skin-friction drag, and grows with the square of the speed in the drag equation. [47], Concorde, a supersonic transport, managed about 17 passenger-miles to the Imperial gallon, which is 16.7 L/100km per passenger; similar to a business jet, but much worse than a subsonic turbofan aircraft.